Assessment Criteria for a Sustainability Impact Assessment in Europe
نویسنده
چکیده
Public economics usually emphasizes the task of “setting the framework conditions” for markets. In formulating such setting, however, research has to deal with imperfect markets, uncertainties, and unknown impacts of any regulatory reform. Against this background, the EU undertakes efforts towards ‘regulatory impact assessment’ and ‘sustainability impact assessment’. The following article derives assessment criteria for any sustainability impact assessment from different strands of economics such as innovation research, new institutional economics and evolutionary economics. It starts from some observations on framing activities, stating that economic policy can be conceptualised as institutional reform rather than a one-off activity. It then elaborates several criteria. Beginning with the established notions of ‘relevance’, ‘effectiveness’, ‘efficiency’ and ‘adaptation flexibility’, the article introduces explicit sub-criteria and guiding questions for thorough analysis. Those eleven criteria are problem identification, decentral solutions & compensation, target setting, target’s implementation, cost reduction, positive side effects, negative side effects, freedom and flexibility, evaluation and review, participation und transparency, control. Some thoughts are made towards an application. The paper is geared towards impact assessments of cross-cutting approaches. The paper concludes with some remarks on the role of those within sustainability strategies. JEL Categories: B52, H11, H41
منابع مشابه
Social sustainability assessment of conversion technologies: Municipal solid waste into bioenergy using Best Worst Method
The majority of sustainability assessments of the bio based industries are primarily focused on the environmental and economic aspects, while social impacts are rarely considered. While overlooking social dimension can have a serious harmful impact across supply chains. To address this issue, this study proposes a modified systemic approach for a social sustainability impact assessment of the te...
متن کاملApplication of rapid impact assessment matrix and sustainability model in environmental impact assessment and operational optimization of solid waste transfer stations in Tehran
Background and Objective: Municipal waste transfer stations (WTS), operate as middle elements in waste collection and transfer to the final disposal site. Besides their benefits in waste transportation cost reduction, WTS can cause negative environmental impacts such as noise, air, and water pollution. Environmental impact assessment is an effective solution to reduce the environmental impacts ...
متن کاملA Comprehensive Framework in Sustainability Assessment of Agricultural Exploitation Systems
Introduction Lack of a comprehensive framework is one of the most important challenges in sustainability assessment of Agricultural Exploitation Systems. This is the reason of tunnel vision in many researches in the field of sustainability. The history of Agricultural Exploitation Systems in Iran is back to thousands years ago, when ancient Iranian tried to domesticate wild animals and cerea...
متن کاملEnvironmental Impact Assessment of Solid Waste Disposal Options in Touristic Islands
Kish Island is a popular tourist destination in Iran, and tourism plays an important role in its economy. The volume of waste produced in the island has increased given the construction of numerous industrial projects over the past decade, as well as an increase in the tourist population. This expansion signals a need to create new methods of waste disposal. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA...
متن کاملAssessment forest sustainability criteria and indicators, Case Study: Bazeft region in Chaharmahal & Bakhtiari Province
The purpose of this research is identification, accomplishing and test value and validity of criterions and sustainable indicators of forest sustainable in Bazeft region. This research is descriptive-exploration and Collective data in this project is based on two quantity (questionnaires) and quality (interview) ways. This research is using 93 indicators and 7 criterions for questionnaire. Fina...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004